Badger Trust fights plan for pilot culls
The Badger Trust has threatened a legal challenge in a bid to stop the forthcoming badger cull trials in two South West areas.
The organisation has written to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs giving it notice of the grounds of challenge, which it intends to pursue if the Government presses ahead with the pilot culls as part of its campaign to stamp out bovine tuberculosis.
-

Defra has until Friday of next week to respond before the trust begins proceedings, but both the Government and farming organisations are expecting a legal challenge.
Last month a decision was taken to allow pilot culls in a TB hotspot area of West Somerset and another in West Gloucestershire. Marksmen from licensed groups of farmers would cull badgers on at least 70 per cent of land in the areas, monitored by a panel of experts from the Royal Veterinary College.
In its letter, the Badger Trust says it believes the policy could be unlawful, giving three grounds on which it bases the claim.
The cull, as proposed, would not meet the "strict legal test" of "preventing the spread of disease" in the licensed areas and could, indeed, actually spread the disease, it said.
It claimed that the guidance on culling given by the Government to Natural England, the licensing body, was invalid, and stated: "Killing badgers is not in fact one of Natural England's functions, which are mainly focused on maintaining biodiversity."
And the trust also challenges the plans on cost issues, arguing that Defra's assessment was based on the free-shooting of badgers, a method "assumed to be much cheaper" than cage trapping.
It states: "If, after the first year of piloting the plans, free-shooting is ruled out for being inhumane, ineffective or unsafe, farmers will be legally obliged to continue the cull on a much more costly trap-and-shoot basis."
This meant significant financial risks for farmers, not properly reflected in the cost impact assessment which underpinned Defra's decision. "This may render the decision unlawful," it adds.
The Badger Trust said it had written the letter, and its deadline for a reply, after taking extensive legal advice, as well as holding several discussions with ministers in person.
Badger Trust chairman David Williams said: "The Badger Trust has responded in detail to both Defra's consultation papers on culling, and suggested viable alternatives.
"However, our concerns that the culls proposed will actually spread the disease have not been heeded. In the light of this, and our concerns over the legality of the decision, we would be failing in our duty to badgers if we did not pursue a legal challenge, despite the difficulty and cost risks involved.
"If there is an opportunity to save many thousands of healthy badgers, as there is here, we must take it, on behalf of the many local badger groups and supporters on whose behalf the Badger Trust works. If successful it would also save farmers the expense of a policy which would not benefit them."
The farming industry has been resigned to facing a legal challenge since the cull announcement – earmarked for this summer and autumn – was made.
"News that the Badger Trust has taken the first steps towards a legal challenge is not surprising," said Mel Squires, South West regional director of the National Farmers' Union. "But we remain committed to supporting the Government's TB-eradication policy to tackle this terrible disease.
"We hope the process is swift and resolves any issues as soon as possible."
Bovine TB was responsible for the deaths of 25,000 cattle in England last year. But both Labour and the RSPCA oppose the current cull plans, clearly the most contentious issue currently facing farming.







14 Comments
View all
by 2ladybugs
Monday, February 13 2012, 2:18PM
“The bonuses to be gained from reducing the numbers of badgers
More ground nesting birds.
More hedgehogs.
Less TB.
It's a no-brainer really.”
by Bangtastic
Monday, February 13 2012, 1:45PM
“Just let them get on with it, they are only badgers after all.
The cost of legal action, for both sides, is unnecessary and a waste of time.
Badgers spread TB, end of. Cull Badgers means decrease the risk of TB, no brainer.”
by BenDover169
Saturday, February 11 2012, 8:28PM
“Chunder it is so much better to test it on animals to make sure it is safe before it is used by humans. Those animals are bred purely for that and I would rather there was a problem found during this testing than any human suffering adverse effects.”
by Chunder123
Saturday, February 11 2012, 2:20PM
“Don't kill animals. THis is bull and is only done for farmers profit. It also raises bad energy and negative karma and could bring mass suffering on human beings as punishment. All of humans wrong doing comes back on us in some way or form. THese are life forms with as much feeling as you and me only they are smaller. Farmers are often don't have any feelings towards animals as they only breed them to kill and make money. THey don't know peace they only know money.. SUch low intelligence would form ideas to just kill something. WHen you think our shops are lined with cosmetic product such as deoderant and perfume all of which are tested on animals but is kept secret and not put on the labels and we make news reports over debates agains harming life forms. Our planet needs urgent help.”
by Bangtastic
Saturday, February 11 2012, 1:37PM
“by Cathysorbo444Saturday, February 11 2012, 12:49PM
"Please sign the 38 Degree Petition http://tinyurl.com/3rozfxu It currently stands at virtually 50,000 - once we can get 100,000 then it HAS to be debated before parliament."
Like thats going to make a difference. It gets debated in Parliament and the overall majority will be for the Cull to go ahead. If that is the case are the left wing tree huggers going to get back in their box and accept the decision to continue with the cull?”
by Bangtastic
Saturday, February 11 2012, 1:34PM
“rambo, whilst the evidence might not be 100% its pretty much conclusive that Badgers do spread the TB, so why take the risk?? Much of our agriculture is based around farming so this needs to be protected more than the vermin badgers, unless of course Badger Burgers suddenly become part of the staple diet.”
by Bangtastic
Saturday, February 11 2012, 1:32PM
“Anyone know where there is a petition we could sign to make sure the Cull goes ahead??”
by Cathysorbo444
Saturday, February 11 2012, 12:49PM
“Please sign the 38 Degree Petition http://tinyurl.com/3rozfxu It currently stands at virtually 50,000 - once we can get 100,000 then it HAS to be debated before parliament.”
by Cathysorbo444
Saturday, February 11 2012, 12:46PM
“I filled out this - where has it gone to?”
by nicold
Saturday, February 11 2012, 12:07PM
“So when the badgers are harassed by the cull (impossible to have 100% clean shots) they will move out of their territory and spread this so called TB! LOL”