Developers want bigger turbines

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Profile image for This is Exeter

This is Exeter

THREE new wind farms destined for areas along the north coast will be generating electricity by the end of 2010.

However, one of them — at Crimp near Morwenstow — is still causing argument after the developers submitted plans to increase their height.

Twenty two turbines at 110m (360ft) tall are to be built at Fullabrook in North Devon by Devon Wind Power.

Galsworthy Farm at Stibb Cross will house a further four 100m high turbines.

And three are planned for Crimp near the North Devon/Cornwall border.

All three proposals sparked fierce opposition from protesters, and members of MAT — Morwenstow Against Turbines — are continuing their fight after developers applied to build higher structures than approved by the planning inspector at Crimp.

In March, the inspector rejected local opposition and granted on appeal permission to build three turbines. These were to be a maximum tower height of 50m with blades of 31m. He also laid down specific rating levels for noise.

West Coast Energy has applied to North Cornwall District Council seeking modifications to a previous condition to get permission to make the towers either 60m or 56m high.

John Moxey, chairman of MAT, said: "It was bad enough when the inspector overruled the views of the parish council, district council and county council and more than 800 letters of objection, but now it seems the developers aren't satisfied with that, they want even more – either that or they got their sums wrong."

MAT is preparing its challenge to the application by seeking legal advice as to whether an inspector's decision can be varied.

Mr Moxey said: "If this is approved then it creates a precedent for every developer who has been given permission to build a wind farm, to come back later and say he wants bigger and more turbines despite any conditions that may have been imposed."

West Coast Energy planning director Stephen Salt said the applications for modifications were due to the fact that since the original plans had been formulated in 2004 turbine technology had changed.

"It is to give us flexibility in turbine choice.

"Since we made the application four years ago turbine technology has changed and the number of turbines in the market place has changed," he said.

Mr Salt said the application for a modification to a 56 metre hub would increase the hub height, but not the size of the blades. However, the other application for a 60 metre hub height would increase the turbine's height by 10 metres, but that turbine would have smaller blades.

He said he was hoping for a decision in the New Year and hoped to start the build in the summer.

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Elizabeth, Bideford

    Wednesday, December 31 2008, 12:28PM

    “At last someone who has done his research and sums, take away the generous amounts of money that the government are giving these companies would they still be as eager to build them!! I was all for them until I had an argument with someone who was anti, so I thought I would prove them wrong and started to research not just here in this country but all over the world, sadly it was me that was proven wrong and I hate to admit this but they are very inefficent in there production, beside in some cases being an eyesore and noisy, yes they are all of you who say you have visited one, try visting one after midnight and think of all those familys living nearby that are having to put up with that noise.
    So Maurice good on you for working it out shame there are not a few more intelligent people around, Im fed up with hearing it will help global warming NOT do a little research and you will see it is helping to make these developers richer and us with less pennies in our pockets because our fuel bills will increase after all how are the government going to get their money back.”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Maurice Clements, Barnstaple

    Wednesday, December 31 2008, 10:05AM

    “Never trust a turbine developer/owner! They are not erecting them for your or my benefit but to line their own pockets. I may be wrong but I believe I read somewhere recently that if you were to add up the output of all the turbines already in existence, it would not come to the output of a single decent sized power station. They are so inefficient!”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article