Devon carries out 18,000 background checks

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

Devon County Council carried out more than 18,000 background checks last year, the second highest rate of any local authority in the country, new figures show.

Councils, private firms and scout groups were among more than 2,000 organisations which ran three million criminal record checks in England and Wales – the equivalent of one in 20 of the population of 55.2 million.

Almost 60,000 checks were made by the Scout Association alone, making it one of the highest users.

Devon County Council's total of 18,686 checks put it 19th in a national table and was only surpassed by one other local authority, Essex, which made almost 22,000 checks. Cornwall Council carried out 8,694 checks and Plymouth City Council 6,354.

A spokesman for Devon County Council said the figure was high because it acted as an "umbrella agency" providing services for "a number of voluntary organisations, charities, external companies, schools/academies and district councils".

The campaign group Big Brother Watch, which released the data following a Freedom of Information Act request, said the figures were "a sad indictment of a country that has lost all sight of proportion and has substituted common sense for a piece of paper".

Nick Pickles, its director, said: "For nearly three million people to be checked in just one year is remarkable. "Given just how many organisations now have access to the system, there is a clear risk that it is easy to delve into someone's private life and run a CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) check without them ever knowing.

"The checks have already been shown to wrongly brand innocent people as criminals and cost people their jobs for totally unrelated incidents that would not suggest they pose a risk.

"It's time to go back to the drawing board and fundamentally reform the CRB system."

The Government has outlined plans to reform the system of criminal records checks, saying it was time to return to a more "common sense" approach.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg announced last February that the current system will be scaled back and only those working most closely with children or vulnerable adults will need to undergo the checks. The results will also be able to move with individuals when they change jobs, cutting down on bureaucracy, the Government said.

A Home Office spokesman said: "The current system of employment checks is too bureaucratic and intrusive.

"That is why we are reforming the regime to scale it back to common-sense levels so that the public are properly protected but the number of excessive checks are substantially reduced."

47
Tweet this article
Report

47 Comments

  • Profile image for Karen362

    by Karen362

    Friday, February 17 2012, 1:28AM

    “I'm tempted to add that in some cases, established psychopaths and serial killers may stand a better chance of obtaining CRB clearance, depending upon the local demand for their skills. But that would be really crass and only make Jerry think I was referring to him again (only winding you up, Jerry, don't worry, mate)”

  • Profile image for accom

    by accom

    Tuesday, February 14 2012, 12:57PM

    “Karen is correct about CRBs being used differently for continuing long-term employees than for new applicants.

    The explanation for your caution not being on your certificate is perhaps you only have a standard CRB, where only unspent convictions appear. But if you have an enhanced one, then this is an error, because enhanced CRBs should by law contain all spent and unspent convictions, cautions, warnings and reprimands, as well as any arrests, even if no further action was taken, and any su****ons that have ever been raised about you (even without your knowledge), regardless of if no further action was taken. So yes, you have been very lucky that this mistake was made, as you may not have got the job you're in if your CRB had been accurate.

    Also, employers of continuing employees just doing another yearly check are unlikely to care about any new convictions they have, as they know and trust the employee, whereas they will never in a million years hire anyone new who has a recent conviction or even arrest. So it is not a level playing fields, it is just giving employers another excuse to use preferential treatment internally and never offer jobs to outsiders.”

  • Profile image for Jerryjones

    by Jerryjones

    Tuesday, February 14 2012, 12:44PM

    “Kagey, please do not comment on something you know nothing about. I have been doing my current job 6 years now and as i said if you bothered to read it before posting profanities, i said "i got a caution when i was a kid"

    SO...How do you explain it saying "NONE" in the box when i got my current job 6 years ago?

    Pay attention dear.”

  • Profile image for Karen362

    by Karen362

    Tuesday, February 14 2012, 12:28PM

    “I think Jerry is missing the point, really. The reason why he's been given CRB clearance is because he's already in a job and not applying for a new one. If he was to leave his current post and apply somewhere else, I doubt if the outcome would be so favourable. A lot of people who have been employed in secure, long-term work are often unaware of the differing criteria applied to local jobless people. New applicants also need to have basic numeracy and literacy skills that many long-term employees have never had to worry about.

    I can't stress enough that CRB checks, like temporary contracts, merely serve part of a wider process of job reduction and disenfranchisement. In the case of the police, one could even argue that CRBs have been cynically used to widen the them and us culture and make tit for tat cuts in policing more palatable to the public over time. You need to look at the bigger picture and have a strategic grasp of policies to understand them fully.”

  • Profile image for accom

    by accom

    Tuesday, February 14 2012, 12:19PM

    “Also there are numerous people with criminal histories who I would not call "criminals". Such as people who've been wrongfully convicted, victims of the strict liability and joint enterprise rules, and people acting in self-defence who've ended up being convicted murderers, e.g. homeowners challenging burglars and women standing up to their abusive husbands.”

  • Profile image for SlobberDan

    by SlobberDan

    Tuesday, February 14 2012, 9:06AM

    “I don't think a criminal who has never committed a crime can actually be called a criminal. So you would hardly expect to find them on a list. However if you can devise a test to find this out I'm sure the police, the courts and batman would be very interested in your work paulmh66.”

  • Profile image for paulmh66

    by paulmh66

    Monday, February 13 2012, 5:53PM

    “Any way, a CRB check is no use against a criminal who has never been caught or has yet to commit a crime. The only use of them is for an employer to keep an eye on those who have been caught for their crime.”

  • Profile image for accom

    by accom

    Monday, February 13 2012, 5:27PM

    “Jerry, you must be lucky if a caution doesn't appear on your CRB check, as that is far from the most trivial thing that comes up on them. Simply being spoken to by a police officer can and does come up. I used to work in probation and I have seen dozens of CRB checks, and warnings, cautions and reprimands have all come up, and I have seen one saying "suspected of benefit fraud by neighbour - under surveillance for 6 months - no fraud detected". Police state of what? Also, I guess it depends on how jobsworth the local police constable is, so there is likely to be irregularity across the country.

    Having your fingerprint taken or helping with a door-to-door enquiry might not lose you a job but it CAN stop you getting a job if you apply, and you are competing with an equally good candidate, and all the employer has to choose between you is the CRB certificate. FrankEnstein has proven that there are definitely employers out there who believe there is no smoke without fire, and would use something as small as that to deny someone a job.

    I helped with a burglary enquiry in Bideford several years ago now, and I just refused to give me name, because I don't want anything else coming up that has nothing to do with me. If you witness a crime or have important details etc., I would encourage everyone to ring the anonymous number rather than the police directly if you want to avoid being classed as a danger to children.”

  • Profile image for Jerryjones

    by Jerryjones

    Monday, February 13 2012, 4:45PM

    “Oh and just to add acomm, they are done in Lancashire and mine was done by a Sharon skinner.

    Just to prove ive had one done and it DID NOT show up my caution when i was a kid.
    There is a box that says "crimes, convictions, cautions, reprimands" Mine says NONE.”

  • Profile image for Jerryjones

    by Jerryjones

    Monday, February 13 2012, 4:39PM

    “accom, dont talk rubbish. I have a FULL CRB check done every year at work due to working with large ammounts of cash. I had a caution when i was a kid too but does not show up on the CRB.
    An before you spout off, i get a copy of the full crb from work and have seen it with my own eyes.

    Seems to me yours comes up because you have done something more than you like us to believe. Unless im the luckiest person in the world for it not to be shown up on.....”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters