MoD wants Batsworthy Cross wind turbines to be illuminated

Trusted article source icon
Friday, January 23, 2009
Profile image for This is Exeter

This is Exeter

The Ministry of Defence has called for proposed wind turbines in North Devon to be lit up at night.

Their suggestion means a planning meeting to consider the proposed wind farm at Batsworthy Cross has been postponed.

The application was due to be discussed on Monday, February 2 at West Anstey Village Hall.

But the meeting was called off today after the MoD submitted a request that the wind turbines be illuminated.

The request came as a surprise to the planning authority, North Devon Council, which thought all consultation responses had already been submitted.

The current plan for the turbines, on the edge of Exmoor, does not include illumination.

North Devon Council now wants to ask groups opposed to the turbine plan, such as the Campaign to Protect Rural England, what they think about the lights demand. The applicants will also need to be consulted.

Npower Renewables Ltd wants to build nine turbines at Batsworthy Cross near Knowstone.

They would be 103 metres high from base to tip. The maximum energy output is predicted to be 22.5MW, enough to power 10,900 homes.

Caroline Harvey, from the Two Moors Campaign, said objectors had been warning the council from the day the application was submitted, two years ago, that the MoD was likely to ask for lights on the turbines. She was surprised the council was surprised by the late request.

She said the lights would only add to the case against the turbines because they would ruin the tranquility of the area and be visible across the region.

The Environment Agency has asked for further clarification on what impact the application could have on private water supplies.

Jasmine Chesters, chairman of the planning committee said: "We realise that this application has been under consideration for a long time. However, it is vital that the council and other relevant groups have been given all the correct information. Only then, when these new issues have been thoroughly examined, can we make a well supported decision."

The assessment is expected to take a minimum of two weeks.

The meeting will be rescheduled.

24
Tweet this article
Report

24 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Stewart, Dorset

    Monday, September 07 2009, 3:40PM

    “Specifically for JASMINE CHESTERS North Devon Planing Committee: -
    We recently put an offer on a house in the Batsworthy Cross area only to discover that it would be clsoe to and within earshot of the proposed windfarm. We have naturally pulled out of the sale because of this - we (including our pets) have no desire to become sick and be kept awake by continuous droning nor do we want the unacceptable eyesore.- If we were the owners of this property we would sue the council for the loss of the sale and demand full compensation. I hope others do this. Money talks. What on earth is the council doing even contemplating this insane application?????”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Mick, South Molton

    Wednesday, January 28 2009, 8:11PM

    “I hope that when Ed is living in his turbine free environment, or enjoying his trips to look at the smaller turbines in Cornwall, he has a thought for all those people living within 2km of a windfarm who are in constant fear from the risk of heart disease, neuroligical problems, insomina, the inability to think properly and, in rare cases, cancer.Scientific research has shown all these illnesses have been proven to be caused by wind turbines. If he can not bring himself to think of these people he might like to consider why families abandon their homes because of the noise from wind farms.He may also like to consider that the vibrations from wind turbines cause thousands of bats to be killed by having their lungs burst.
    Perhaps his liking of wind farms means he is able to ignore these problems and perhaps he also has more spare money than most people who, particularly importantly in these gloomy times, could do with their money which is being given to wind power companies in the form of huge "incentives" without their consent.
    The boss of Eon is reported as saying without subsidies wind farms would not be built- so much for the claim that the wind energy companies are building windfarms to "save the planet".

    This phoney green agenda has been exposed completely by the recent decision to extend and build new airports throughout the country.”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Ross, Bideford

    Wednesday, January 28 2009, 10:35AM

    “James Millar's comment was spot on and very well put. 22 sqn at RMB Chivenor is one of the busiest search and rescue squadrons in the country, along with RAF fast jet training over Devon our skies are alot busier then people may realise. It would be irresponisble to construct a '30 storey' building with out the usual safe guards in place.”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Anon, N Devon

    Tuesday, January 27 2009, 3:18PM

    “Take note NDCC Councillors!! Today - January 27 - Eden has WITHDRAWN its application for giant turbines near St. Austell - due to community opposition, and has agreed to pursue other energy saving options in consultation with the community. This is a great precedent for North Devon - to save us from the marginally economical turbine blight.”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Chloe, Tiverton

    Monday, January 26 2009, 8:36PM

    “Liz, I¿m sure you know the answer but for the benefit of other readers, here¿s the answer to your question as to who advises the government:
    http://www.renewables-advisory-board.org.uk/
    ¿The Renewables Advisory Board (RAB) provides advice to Government on a wide range of renewable energy issues. The board is an independent, non-departmental public body sponsored by the the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), that brings together government departments, the renewables industry and the unions.
    It aims to provide the Secretary of State with independent, impartial and authoritative advice on policies, programmes and measures, to improve Government understanding of the obstacles and opportunities for the development and deployment of renewable technologies in the UK, both in the short term and over the next 20 years, and make specific recommendations.¿

    And here are its appointed board members:
    http://www.renewables-advisory-board.org.uk/RAB_members.htm
    There are 18 Appointed Members of the Board, selected from all sectors of the renewables industry.
    Mr Alan Moore ex-Chairman BWEA (British Wind Energy Association i.e. the industry trade lobby group)
    Mr Andrew Mill Chief Executive Offficer NaREC
    Mr David Still Managing Director Clipper Wind Europe
    Mr Matthew Spencer Chief Executive Regen SW
    Mr David Williams Managing Director Eco2 Ltd
    Mr Brian Mark Director of Sustainability Fulcrum Consulting
    Mr Simon Roberts Chief Executive Centre for Sustainable Energy
    Mr Michael Rolls Managing Director, Power Plants Siemens Power Generation
    Mr Keith Anderson Director for Renewables Scottish Power
    Mr Paul Jefferiss Head of Environmental Policy BP
    Mr Peter Rolton Managing Director Rolton Group
    Mr David Sowden Managing Director JDS Consulting Associates Ltd
    Dr Chris Veal Babcock & Brown
    Mr John Seed Helius Energy Plc
    Miss Juliet Davenport Good Energy Group plc.
    Mr Nicholas Rigby Npower Renewables
    Mrs Sue Wheeler Head of New Energy Centrica Energy
    Dr Keith Maclean Scottish and Southern Energy
    Yeah really independent¿
    PS Ed, it¿s the way some signs are being translated between applications as you¿ve discovered ¿ have you anything of substance to say on the matter of wind turbines, the subject of these comments, rather than on translation between computer applications. My post is not the only one to suffered odd translations on this page

    Chomsky of Barnstaple
    James Millar of Braunton is correct; the MoD agrees with him and disagrees with you; they have said the Fullabrook wind turbines must be lit.(They made this demand after the public enquiry but it still has to be adhered to).”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Chomsky, Barnstaple

    Monday, January 26 2009, 5:00PM

    “Yeah right, James, you often get low-flying 777s scooting along round here...”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by James Millar, Braunton

    Monday, January 26 2009, 4:58PM

    “For safety's sake the proposed 22 turbines at Fullabrook Down should be illuminated, too. Three air miles from the MOD at Chivenor and the Air-sea Rescue helicopter base, on the passenger plane flight path to Heath Row, between two aircraft radar points, near irregular winds from high cliffs. High aircraft safety illumination should have neen a major feature of the original Fullabrook plans.”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Ed, Bideford

    Monday, January 26 2009, 1:57PM

    “lol at myself - I meant a ' not a @ oops still at least I attempt to correct after the event and not leave lol”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Ed, Bideford

    Monday, January 26 2009, 1:56PM

    “To Chloe, Tiverton, it is rather difficult to take anything you say very seriously when you can't even work out how to use a @ instead of an upsidedown question mark! Maybe you should research that first instead of scaremongering! I fully support wind turbines and also don't think they look ugly. There are far uglier things in the countryside.”

  • Profile image for This is Exeter

    by Anon, England

    Monday, January 26 2009, 1:33PM

    “Larry, you still have to have transmission lines to take the power from the turbines to the end users. And lighting is a well documented necessity because of aircraft of all sizes. And think of UFO safety too!!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters